My name is Kaylee, and in this video I'm going
to look into the claim made by paleontologist Clifford Miles
on the NASCAR alien mummies being a new genus and
species.
But is this fact or is this just fiction?
Recently I came across a tweet by Tyler Greenfield who
mentioned on Twitter, I'm not calling it X, just refusing
on Twitter who mentioned that paleontologist Clifford Miles named the
NASCAR alien mummies as a new genus and a new
species.
He also kindly shared the link to Clifford's self published
paper.
So I did my due diligence and I went to
the website where one can access the self published paper
by Clifford Miles and the website is simply called themilespaper.com.
The paper is sectioned into two parts and to be
completely honest, at first glance and I'm not a professional,
it looked nothing like a scientific paper.
The paper is dated October 2022.
No actual day is given in the date, and apparently
it's already about a year old.
I also want to say that I'm going to look
into Part 1 of the paper, mostly because Part 2
is just the evidence of aliens and it's very not
good.
Clifford Miles is a retired paleontologist who used to work
at the Western Paleontological Labs.
So let's take a look at the contents of the
paper.
It starts with an introduction where Clifford Miles talks about
two forces at play in regards to extraterrestrial truth.
On one side, there's the group of people who control
the alien narrative, who he claims keep the truth from
ever seeing light of day in the interest of national
security.
Why it's not International Security?
I mean, I honestly don't know, but it's just like
in the movies, only America is, you know, the victim
of alien invasions for some reason.
He then mentioned the other group are the people in
the know who are making efforts to get the information
and proof out in the open.
He apparently chose to stay quiet in regards to making
this paper public, that no one had the slightest idea
that he was going to make it public.
He says that he can prove scientifically that aliens are
real and that he can also prove what the hard
working UFO researchers have been trying to tell us for
decades is real.
I mean, I've seen some of his evidence and it's
just old YouTube videos that we all know are fake.
Sorry.
He assembled what he considered to be the strongest material
for worldwide disclosure and he wrote this paper already.
This introduction is a hoot.
Now let's get into the paper written by Clifford Miles.
In the abstract, he explains that a new family, genus
and species is being described.
That this new species has a single lower arm bone,
which is something that no known ancestor in our fossil
record have, and that According to him, no animals on
Earth, living or extinct have.
None of them have a single lower arm bone.
So According to him, this feature makes a strong case
that these mummies did not evolve on Earth.
He says that this is an upright bipedal species with
both reptile and mammalian features in their skeletons.
That the body plan of these mummies is similar to
humans.
Although he says in an example of their terrestrial nature
that there are differences, like these mummies don't have an
opposable thumb.
They can't give you the thumbs up, which is a
shame.
He also claims that they look like typical grey alien
species that have been reported over the decades, Although, you
know, there's never been any actual scientific proof of these
grey aliens.
So how do we know what they look like?
Well, from YouTube videos and all of that, of course.
Duh.
It then explains that the description of this new family,
genus and species is based on 8 individuals that were
discovered in Peru in 2016, of which five individuals are
complete.
One individual is only missing its head, and there are
two individuals who we only have the head from.
It was the particular individual without a head that was
used for DNA studies along with one of the two
loose skulls.
Apparently during the research it was apparent that neither loose
skull belonged to the headless individual.
I'm so sorry we couldn't find your head.
He then goes on to explain that we have a
humanoid being with a mammal like feature of a clavicle,
better known as the collarbone that looked very much like
our own.
He says that the basic body plan of this new
species is like ours with a head, shoulders, trunk, arms
and legs.
In that you can see that it was bipedal and
walked upright.
He says that these beings have a large elongated skull,
large forward facing eyes, no teeth, horizontal ribs that start
at dorsal 7A, single lower arm bone, a single lower
leg bone, one bone in each wrist, no ankle bones,
and that the pelvic girdle is absent.
But instead they have a cloaca like opening for the
deposition of eggs and that they have reptile like skin
and fingernails.
Miles then says that the fact that they are here
with flesh and bones preserved implies that their ancestors should
be in the fossil record, and the fact that they
are not implies that they did not originate on Earth.
According to him.
He claims that he has never seen the possibility of
a remote ancestor of these alien mummies in the fossil
record.
He claims to have discussed it with colleagues and that
they agreed with him, although he doesn't say which colleagues.
So we don't know the validity of this claim, but
his co-author Kenneth Carpenter, who worked with him on a
different paleontological paper in the past, not on this one,
but in the past, wrote a scathing peer review of
this NASCAR alien mummy paper where he disregards the claims
made by Miles.
So I have decided not to go into detail when
it comes to the Miles paper.
This is because honestly, the paper is just ludicrous.
Therefore, I have decided to mostly look into Kenneth Carpenter's
peer review of the paper.
Carpenter says that these bodies of the alien mummies are
actually altered human and animal bones.
Knowing the size of these mummies, probably infants and very
young children, He states that it's not a question of
whether he believes or not that there is life on
other planets, as statistically there is a very high probability,
but the evidence of visitation is not very good.
Carpenter also manipulated the X-ray of a squirrel monkey, which
he created by manipulating the X-rays to show how easily
this can be done to make something look more alien.
You can see the squirrel monkey right there.
I mean, it looks alien, but it's just a squirrel
merged with a monkey in an X-ray.
He also states that this is not evidence that the
images that Miles used were modified, but that it cannot
be ruled out.
He believes Miles to be an honorable person and that
Miles took the images he got at face value.
He definitely doesn't say that Miles manipulated X-rays or CT
scans, but unless Miles can document an unbroken chain of
custody from the original CTS to himself, there will always
be a level of doubt on the validity of the
images.
The original CT disk should have all the metadata about
when and where the CTS were made, which is why
he asked Miles for this disk and he didn't receive
it, probably because Miles doesn't actually have the original disk.
He explains that given how realistic dinosaurs in Jurassic Park
movies look, he knows that believable computer graphic results of
X-ray and CT images are possible and that it's easy
to manipulate pre-existing X-ray images as he has evidently shown
with, you know, the squirrel monkey.
He then goes on to talk about the DNA results
showing both human and probably contaminated, and that the claims
made by Yamin and Korotkov, who did the DNA analysis
on how the DNA is not human is cherry picking
from the various reports submitted to them by the labs.
According to Carpenter, this is not an either or situation.
For example, if it's not human, it therefore must be
alien, as Yamin and Korodkov assume.
Microbial contamination of archaeological material has been known to be
problematic in the past, he explains, as is the possibility
that the analysis was done on animal tissue, for example
a llama, because there have been talks that at least
parts of the skulls of the mummies are probably a
llama.
Carpenter explains that tissue samples for DNA analysis should be
extracted from the center of the bones to avoid the
issue of contamination.
However, there's no indication that this was done for the
DNA analysis of the Miles paper.
He then goes on to talk about how a life
form that independently evolved on another planet having the same
chemical basis in DNA, let alone the DNA structure to
be so similar to humans is remarkable.
He of course doesn't say it's impossible, but it's nearly
impossible.
Even more so in the light of the Soviet experiments
back in the 1920s of human chimp hybrids that failed.
Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with us humans, and
we are to believe that the aliens have evolved independently,
have more than 99% similarities to us, which is, statistically
speaking, highly unlikely, although not impossible.
But let's be honest, it's nearly impossible.
He also explains there is an issue with how the
gender of the corpses was determined from the DNA, given
that the DNA was said to be alien and the
DNA labs have no prior knowledge for the chromosomes for
gender as they do for humans when it comes to
these aliens.
Of course, as I think almost all of you watching
this will know, the chromosome for human females is XX
and for the human male is XY, whereas the Komodo
monitor reptilian chromosomes for male is ZZ and for females
it's ZW.
The point that he makes here is that reptile chromosomes
are very different from humans, and that although the humans
and the Komodo monitor evolved on the same planet, we
cannot interbreed.
So how likely would this be with alien reptiles?
Not likely.
Honestly, not likely at all.
In the Miles paper, Miles mentions the alien mummies to
have a cloaca for the deposition of eggs.
Carpenter then looked at the X-rays of said eggs and
explains that they are radio opaque objects blocking most X-rays,
which implies that they are solid.
I've never heard of a solid egg actually being an
egg.
There are no indications for the clamedalian eggs to be
eggs without any analysis to show that they are.
The evidence for the eggs therefore is unsubstantiated.
And then there is the contradiction of one bone in
the lower arm of the little corpses versus 2 bones
in the lower arm in the adult individual they've dubbed
Maria.
And the vertebral column of Maria looks human.
Maria is actually just a human skeleton except for the
three digit fingers and toes, whereas those of the little
bodies look like human infants or young children cervicals.
They probably used infant or young children bones to create
these little bodies.
Carpenter then goes to hypothesize where the bones may have
come from in his scientific opinion.
I definitely wanted to note that.
So there is a prehistoric Icachincha cemetery near Nazca dating
from 1450 CE to about 900 CE, with thousands of
bones littering the surface, which would be a possible source
for the human bones that were used in the creation
of these alien mummies.
Given that infant mortality is known to have been high
in the ancient world, there would have been plenty to
utilize.
He of course says that this is not proof of
the source of the human bones, but that the possibility
cannot be ignored.
The radiometric dates of the so-called aliens fall into the
age of this particular Peruvian culture that lived in the
area of Nazca.
He continues his review in more detail as to how
some of the bodies were found and the contradictions in
those discovery stories.
But I honestly feel like I have given you, my
viewers, more than enough information to create your own opinion
on these alien NASCAR mummies.
So for those of you that want to read more,
because the Miles paper itself is like 300 pages long
and I do not want to feel like ripping out
my hair for a second longer, But if you want
to feel like that, please go read it.
Carpenter also doesn't question the analysis done by Miles, but
he questions the data from which Miles based his interpretations.
Given that the source, Koratkov and Yaman have dubious histories
prior to the discovery of these alien bodies, the evidence
for the claims is tainted.
So feel free to read up more about all this
yourself.
Go and read the Miles paper.
Seriously, if you want to feel like ripping your hair
out, please do.
I felt like that when I was reading it to
write this script.
So what do you think about the Miles paper and
the peer review of Carpenter?
Let me know in the comments down below.