Our audience wants to know, hey,
you know, this all sounds great,
but wasn't this all put to bed by both a
federal District Court,
a judge, a trial court judge,
an appeals court. You guys have spent years in this,
never got any traction. Why are you bothering the Supreme
Court now?
Why is poor Judge Roberts,
I guess, got to deal with this?
Well, well, two reasons. I mean,
we think that the lower courts were wrong in their
decisions,
but perhaps more importantly, we have new evidence that supports
standing.
This case was dismissed by the lower court saying that
the claims about the machines were too speculative
and we have concrete evidence that's new that was not
known before.
Where the defendants told the courts that hey,
these machines are certified by the Election Assistance Commission,
their software is certified, we perform logic and accuracy tests
and and other matters.
But those two issues they represent to the court that
This is why the machines are safe and why the
plaintiffs carry lakes and Mark Fenschen's claims
didn't hold water. We've uncovered 3 pieces of evidence.
One in 2020 and in
2022 they used altered software and any statement that that
software is certified by the EAC is false.
They falsely stated that to the court.
They falsely stated that to the Arizona Senate during that
audit in 21 and they falsely stated on their website
second thing that was false.
They say they perform logic and accuracy testing and that's
a pre election test designed to give people confidence that
the machines will actually tabulate and read votes as they
are. They did not. They did not perform logic and
accuracy tests on any
of the Vote Center tabulators they used in either the
2020 or the
2022 election. They used five spares.
If you combine that with the fact that they're using
altered software,
and it's important to note the altered software was with
respect to a configuration file called the machine behavior settings.
And that goes directly to how ballots are read and
tabulated.
And then there is a third piece of evidence that
is perhaps I think,
the most shocking because it doesn't apply just to Maricopa,
our cyber experts. Our team
has uncovered that the master cryptographic
encryption keys that are used to govern and encrypt all
election data,
the files, the software, have been left open on the
database in plain text.
And what that means? If you remember the Enigma machine
in World War 2
when the Grapevine was they were able to decrypt that
cipher code and then read the Germans messages.
Well this is even easier because now any malicious actor,
any insider, anyone who knows to get into the
into the machine, which is very easy to do because
it's just windows login.
You can bypass that within 3 minutes.
Can control an entire election,
can cover their tracks so it's nearly undetectable.
Can intercept any election results that are transmitted
because they have the private key that allows him to
decrypt that information,
put change the results, re encrypt that information because it's
essentially a God key.
This is the most basic security
violation that one can have.
If you talk to any cyber security professional to leave
the master cryptographic keys in plain text available to anybody
who knows where to look.
That is, it's a violation of
of the most basic security standards,
but more importantly, it allows a malicious actor to control
the entire election
and do anything they want and escape detection.