Welcome back America. We're here with our friend Mr.
Conservative in the Senate. Ted Cruz is running for re
election of the Senate against Mr.
Marxist Socialist. Nonetheless, Ted Cruz It is my contention that
this is the most lawless administration in American history and
I'd like your input on this
on a number of grounds.
He's defied 2 Supreme Court decisions and he brags about
it.
He has violated our immigration laws,
and he is happy about it.
He violates Title 9 by
redefining it in the Civil Rights Act to eliminate effectively,
women's sports. He's violating separation of powers by legislating on
his own by budgeting and spending on his own by
using regulations to get around Congress where the EPA is
running amok. And so are the other departments.
He's impounding federal funds from Israel,
despite the fact that you folks have voted to get
armaments to Israel as fast as possible.
He's violating the Impoundment Act and the Take Care Clause
of the Constitution.
He's using the federal bureaucracy to register voters in targeted
Democrat
areas. And he's unconstitutionally appointed through his attorney general,
a rogue prosecutor whose entire job is to harass,
smear, indict, and, they hope,
convict Donald Trump of something.
Which brings us to executive privilege,
which I talked about in my opening statement.
He has waived executive privilege over and over and over
and over again to push out presidential documents during the
Trump administration,
ordering the Archives to give it to the January 6th
Stalinist Commission under Nancy Pelosi.
He's all but destroyed executive privilege.
And then a few days ago,
all of a sudden,
he asserts executive privilege at the request of the attorney
general,
who's facing a contempt vote in the House
to cover up his audio
of his interview, the text of which is out in
the public
in order to protect himself from the election,
which has no constitutional basis.
So what do you make of all this?
You know, Mark, one of these days you're going to
say something I disagree with,
but it hasn't happened yet.
At every word of what you just said is exactly
right,
that this is a brazen president.
This is a brazen Department of Justice.
Merrick Garland. You and I both know Merrick Garland.
He spent 24 years as a judge.
He actually had a good reputation as a Court of
Appeals judge.
I had some glimmer of hope that that that that
he might do the job with integrity.
He has proven to be the most partisan
and the most lawless attorney general in our
nation's history. And you are right,
this administration. Listen, I've said a number of times,
Donald Trump broke the Democrat Party.
They hate him so much that their minds have been
shattered and they've convinced themselves that Trump is Adolf Hitler.
And because Trump is Hitler,
anything, anything, anything is justified to stop him.
You you you talked about these ridiculous trials
in over 200 years. We have never once indicted a
president or former president
in our entire country's history until this past year when
the Democrats have done so four times.
Every one of these cases is #1 an abuse of
power because they hate Donald Trump.
But #2, it is an assault on the American people.
It's an assault on democracy.
I got to say, I actually think Sigmund Freud,
it is rolling over. It is grave because the Democrats
engage in Freudian projection at a level I've never seen.
They beat their chest. They say we're defending democracy and
they are engaged in an assault on democracy.
And and you mentioned that the,
the the assertion of executive privilege,
I actually view that as just mockery because it it
is a ludicrous claim,
as you know. Well, executive privilege exists to protect the
conversation between the president and his senior advisors.
Now, mind you, the radical left doesn't care about executive
privilege if it's a Republican president.
And that's why Peter Navarro is in jail right now
because he asserted executive privilege when when Congress tried to
get him to divulge his conversations with President Trump and
they sent him to jail over.
And they're about to send Steve Bannon to jail over
the exact same thing.
But in this instance, there's not even a credible claim
of executive privilege.
Why? Because when Joe Biden was talking with Robert,
her, he wasn't talking to a subordinate.
He wasn't instructing a subordinate in his administration what to
do.
Look, if Joe Biden, We're having a conversation with Merrick
Garland about the priorities of the Department of Justice,
that could well be covered by executive privilege.
But in this instance, Robert Hur was a special counsel.
He was investigating Joe Biden for multiple felonies.
Joe Biden was effectively a criminal defendant.
That is not executive privilege.
He was not setting policy at that moment.
Robert Hur was not there as a subordinate.
He was there as a prosecutor.
And the claim is laughable.
And by the way, Robert Hur concluded,
yes, Joe Biden committed multiple felonies.
He did so knowingly, willingly,
brazenly, over and over and over again,
and then on behalf of the Biden Department of Justice,
he said. But we're not going to charge him because
Joe Biden is not competent to stand trial.
He's too old and senile.
No jury would convict him.
And yet nonetheless, this person,
not competent to stand trial,
has the nuclear codes and remains our commander in
Which is this, the 25th Amendment
was intended to deal with situations like this where you
have basically
a disabled president. We know he's disabled.
That's why they treat him like a a a a
calf in a cage, you know,
That's why they don't let him out.
That's why when he's shuffling from the helicopter,
the staff blocks. And that's why he's had less
press conferences than any president.
That's why he doesn't do much public speaking without his
talking points.
He he is the least available president to the public.
They're trying to cover this up.
That's why the debate standards have been set.
No audience. He wants his own journalist.
You can't interrupt them. Everything is built around Joe Biden's
mental disabilities.
Don't we as a people,
they talk about the public interest.
Don't we have a right to know that the Democrats
are going to nominate a man
who may not be fit for president mentally and physically,
rather than calling that politics?
Isn't that exactly what our Republic is about,
That we need to know who these candidates are given
the power of the presidency?
I want you to answer that when we return.